1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 29 Wis.2d
  5. 29 Wis.2d 489 (1966)
 

DeVOUGAS v. STATE

29 Wis.2d 489 (1966)

DEVOUGAS, Plaintiff in error, v. STATE, Defendant in error.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

January 4, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the plaintiff in error there was a brief and oral argument by Richard J. Steinberg of Milwaukee.

For the defendant in error the cause was argued by Richard B. Surges, first assistant district attorney of Milwaukee county, with whom on the brief were Bronson C. La Follette, attorney general, and Hugh R. O'Connell, district attorney.

WILKIE, J.

Although one of the defendant's writs of error seeks a review of the judgment of conviction entered on February 19, 1964, DeVougas made no argument here that the judgment was erroneous. His entire argument goes to the refusal to permit him to withdraw his plea of guilty. A motion to withdraw a plea of guilty and, consequently, to grant a new trial, is not governed by sec. 958.06, Stats., but is a motion directed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases