1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 31 Wis.2d
  5. 31 Wis.2d 481 (1966)
 

CHEVROLET DIVISION, G. M. C., v. INDUSTRIAL COMM.

31 Wis.2d 481 (1966)

CHEVROLET DIVISION, GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION, Defendant and Appellant: MARZAHL, Defendant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

July 1, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant Industrial Commission the cause was argued by Gordon Samuelsen, assistant attorney general, with whom on the brief was Bronson C. La Follette, attorney general.

For the respondent there was a brief by Berg & Gage of Janesville, and oral argument by Louis Gage.

CURRIE, C. J.

The issues on this appeal are:

(1) Is mandamus an available remedy to review the action of the commission in refusing to consider and act upon General Motors' petition for review of the examiner's findings and interlocutory order?

(2) Was such petition for review timely "filed" with the commission within the requirement of sec. 102.18 (3), Stats.?

Availability of Mandamus as a Remedy...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases