1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 260 F.Supp.
  5. 260 F.Supp. 252 (1966)
 

LICHINA v. FUTURA, INC.

Civ. A. No. 9071.

260 F.Supp. 252 (1966)

Robert LICHINA, Plaintiff, v. FUTURA, INC., a Delaware corporation, and Riblet Tramway Company, a Washington corporation, Defendants.

United States District Court D. Colorado.

August 29, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William H. Erickson, Denver, Colo., and Tilg & Koch, Milwaukee, Wis., for plaintiff.

Sheldon & Nordmark, by Richard C. McLean, Denver, Colo., for defendant Futura, Inc., and Darwin D. Coit, Denver, Colo., for defendant Riblet Tramway Co.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

ARRAJ, Chief Judge.

This matter is before the Court on the motions of defendant Riblet Tramway Company to quash service of the alias summons and second amended complaint, to vacate the Orders of the Court dated July 29, 1966, to dismiss, and to strike portions of the second amended complaint. The Court granted an earlier motion to quash because the plaintiff failed to comply with the exact procedure prescribed in Colo.Rev.Stat...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases