1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 30 Wis.2d
  5. 30 Wis.2d 481 (1966)
 

CONRAD MILWAUKEE CORP. v. WASILEWSKI

30 Wis.2d 481 (1966)

CONRAD MILWAUKEE CORPORATION, Appellant, v. WASILEWSKI, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

April 12, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there were briefs by Whyte, Hirschboeck, Minahan, Harding & Harland, attorneys, and Roger C. Minahan, Richard P. Buellesbach, and Richard C. Ninneman of counsel, all of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Mr. Roger C. Minahan and Mr. Ninneman.

For the respondent there was a brief by John B. Nichols, attorney, and Thomas J. Bergen of counsel, both of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Mr. Bergen.

HALLOWS, J.

The plaintiff contends time is of the essence in respect to the expiration date of the option to purchase contained in the lease and such option expired before the defendant attempted to exercise it. It is further contended the option is expressed in unambiguous language and the expiration date cannot be modified by other documents or by oral testimony because of the parolevidence rule and because such evidence...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases