1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Md.
  4. 242 Md.
  5. 242 Md. 269 (1966)
 

MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL v. MULLER

[No. 202, September Term, 1965.]

242 Md. 269 (1966)

219 A.2d 91

MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE, ET AL. v. MULLER, ET AL.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Decided April 25, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Donald F. Rogers and Simon Schonfield, Assistant City Solicitor, with whom were Joseph Allen, City Solicitor, Ambrose T. Hartman, Deputy City Solicitor, and Edward L. Coleman on the brief, for appellants.

Clement R. Mercaldo and Walter C. Herlihy, with whom was Samuel J. Aaron on the brief, for appellees.

The cause was argued before HAMMOND, HORNEY, MARBURY, BARNES and McWILLIAMS, JJ.

BARNES, J., delivered the opinion of the Court.

The appellees, William F. Muller, Eleanor H. Muller, his wife, and Roland Bounds, executor, as owners of the property in Baltimore City known as 4623-25 Bowleys Lane, filed an application on November 30, 1964 with the Building Inspection Engineer of Baltimore City, as Zoning Commissioner, for a permit to erect a gasoline filling station. This application was denied by the Zoning Commissioner and on appeal to the Board...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases