1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 29 Wis.2d
  5. 29 Wis.2d 479 (1966)
 

HARRIS v. STATE

29 Wis.2d 479 (1966)

HARRIS, Plaintiff in error, v. STATE, Defendant in error.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

January 4, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the plaintiff in error there was a brief by Peter W. Bunde, attorney, and Norman L. Winn of counsel, both of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Mr. Bunde.

For the defendant in error the cause was argued by Paul T. Miller, assistant district attorney of Milwaukee county, with whom on the brief were Bronson C. La Follette, attorney general, William A. Platz, assistant attorney general, and Hugh R. O'Connell, district attorney.

CURRIE, C. J.

Defendant attacks the judgment of conviction on these three grounds:

(1) He was placed in double jeopardy.

(2) He was denied due process of law because he was interrogated by the police without being advised of his right to remain silent and of his right to counsel.

(3) There is insufficient credible evidence to sustain his conviction.

Double Jeopardy.

Defendant's claim of double jeopardy is premised upon...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases