MAEZ v. UNITED STATES

No. 8828.

367 F.2d 139 (1966)

Basilio David MAEZ, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit.

September 29, 1966.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joseph C. Jaudon, Lakewood, Colo., for appellant.

John A. Babington, Asst. U. S. Atty. (John Quinn, U. S. Atty., was with him on the brief), for appellee.

Before MURRAH, Chief Judge, SETH, Circuit Judge, and CHIT SON, District Judge.


PER CURIAM.

In this § 2255 proceeding petitioner contends that his guilty plea to narcotic charges was not free and voluntary because entered under the duress of withdrawal pains associated with his drug addiction — because he "wanted to get everything over with." The trial judge had no doubt of the Petitioner's addiction when he was arrested on April 29, 1963, or that he suffered withdrawal pains for which he...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases