WILD v. ROMAN


91 N.J. Super. 410 (1966)

220 A.2d 711

CAROL WILD AND STANLEY WILD, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. DR. EMANUEL ROMAN, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided June 8, 1966.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Albert L. Cohn argued the cause for appellants (Messrs. David & Albert L. Cohn, attorneys; Mr. Daniel Crystal, on the brief).

Mr. Charles C. Stalter argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Stalter, Doan & DeYoe, attorneys; Mr. Aaron Dines, on the brief).

Before Judges GAULKIN, LABRECQUE and BROWN.


The opinion of the court was delivered by GAULKIN, S.J.A.D.

Plaintiffs' true name is Wild. The pleadings shall be considered corrected accordingly.

Plaintiffs sued defendant dentist for malpractice. The jury returned a verdict in favor of defendant and plaintiffs appeal.

Plaintiffs contend that the trial judge erred when he charged the jury as follows:

"Now there was some dispute among counsel about the fact the statement was made that certain...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases