The board found that the claimant, although admittedly wishing to work only for a temporary period, had consistently sought permanent work, that she failed to make an active and realistic search for work and that her job efforts were token in nature and did not show a genuine attachment to the labor market. "Whether a person is available for employment during a specific period is a question of fact to be determined by the referee and the Appeal...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
