1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.2d
  4. 240 Cal.App.2d
  5. 240 Cal.App.2d 254 (1966)
 

RANDLE v. CAL. STATE BD. OF PHARMACY

Docket No. 22471.

240 Cal.App.2d 254 (1966)

49 Cal. Rptr. 485

CECIL RANDLE et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. CALIFORNIA STATE BOARD OF PHARMACY, Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Two.

February 18, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Rex E. Shoop and Frank M. Brown for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General, and Gerald F. Carreras, Deputy Attorney General, for Defendant and Respondent.

AGEE, J.

Appellants, husband and wife, brought this mandate proceeding to set aside the decision of respondent board revoking appellant Lloyd R. Randle's certificate to practice pharmacy and appellant Cecil Randle's permit to maintain and conduct a pharmacy.

The two are jointly charged in the first four of the five counts alleged in the accusation filed with the board. The fifth count is against the husband alone. The wife's responsibility for the claimed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases