DINZLER v. LOMBARDO


25 A.D.2d 467 (1966)

Herbert Dinzler et al., Respondents, v. Alfred Lombardo, Appellant, et al., Defendant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Third Department.

January 13, 1966


Per Curiam.

The notes are complete and regular upon their face. Appellant concedes that he signed the notes, but his answer pleads that they were given without consideration and upon false representations. His affidavits in opposition to the motion for summary judgment allege, rather vaguely and with some inconsistencies and seeming contradictions, business transactions between the parties and assert that appellant signed the notes, in blank, without consideration...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases