1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Md.
  4. 243 Md.
  5. 243 Md. 244 (1966)
 

DANIELS v. STATE, ETC.

[No. 345, September Term, 1965.]

243 Md. 244 (1966)

220 A.2d 604

DANIELS v. STATE OF MARYLAND TO THE USE OF AND FOR THE BENEFIT OF DEOUDES, ET AL.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Decided June 24, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John M. McInerney, with whom were McInerney, Latham & Layne on the brief, for appellant.

J. Joseph Barse, with whom were Welch, Daily & Welch on the brief, for appellees.

The cause was argued before PRESCOTT, C.J., and HORNEY, MARBURY, OPPENHEIMER and McWILLIAMS, JJ.

HORNEY, J., delivered the opinion of the Court.

This appeal presents unusual procedural questions concerning the entry of a "final" judgment on a directed verdict pursuant to Maryland Rule 567 e despite the pendency of a motion for a new trial filed in pursuance of Rule 567 a and the filing of a "motion to correct record" more than thirty days after the inadvertently entered judgment had become enrolled under the provisions of Rule 625 concerning the revisory power...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases