1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 92 N.J.
  5. 92 N.J. Super. 392 (1966)
 

PINTER v. PARSEKIAN

92 N.J. Super. 392 (1966)

223 A.2d 635

DREW PINTER, AN INFANT BY HIS GUARDIAN AD LITEM, KATHERINE PINTER, AND KATHERINE PINTER AND JOSEPH PINTER, INDIVIDUALLY, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. NED J. PARSEKIAN, DIRECTOR OF THE DIVISION OF MOTOR VEHICLES IN THE DEPARTMENT OF LAW AND PUBLIC SAFETY, STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided October 31, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Philip Blacher argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Rafferty & Blacher, attorneys).

Mr. Sanford Rader argued the cause for respondents (Messrs. Kovacs, Anderson, Horowitz & Rader, attorneys).

Before Judges GAULKIN, LEWIS and LABRECQUE.

LABRECQUE, J.A.D.

Defendant appeals from judgments in favor of plaintiffs following a jury verdict.

On February 7, 1963 an automobile driven by Joseph Pinter in which Katherine Pinter, his wife, and Drew Pinter, his son, were passengers, was involved in a head-on collision with another driven by one Richard Solarczyk. The collision occurred on Solarczyk's side of the highway, and Pinter's presence there was...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases