1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Or.
  4. 245 Or.
  5. 245 Or. 239 (1966)
 

MARTIN v. VAN HOOMISSEN

245 Or. 239 (1966)

421 P.2d 369

MARTIN v. VAN HOOMISSEN ET AL

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Dismissed December 21, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William C. Martin, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief were Dusenbery, Martin, Beatty, Parks & Templeton, John C. Beatty, Jr., and Frederick T. Smith, Portland.

Willis A. West, Chief Civil Deputy District Attorney, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was George Van Hoomissen, District Attorney, Portland.

Before McALLISTER, Chief Justice, and PERRY, SLOAN, O'CONNELL, GOODWIN, DENECKE and HOLMAN, Justices.

CASE DISMISSED.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order of the circuit court for Multnomah county which approved the ballot title for an initiative measure to repeal the Multnomah County Home Rule Charter. This is the same initiative measure involved in our decision in Stuart v. Weldon, 245 Or. 203, 421 P.2d 367 (1966). That decision makes this case moot and the case is, therefore...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases