1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 31 Wis.2d
  5. 31 Wis.2d 447 (1966)
 

BRATT v. PETERSON

31 Wis.2d 447 (1966)

BRATT, Appellant, v. PETERSON, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

July 1, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there were briefs by Donald J. Harman and Johns, Pappas & Flaherty, all of La Crosse, and oral argument by Mr. Harman.

For the respondent there was a brief by William N. Koslo and Fugina, Kostner, Ward, Kostner & Galstad, all of Arcadia, and oral argument by La Vern Kostner.

WILKIE, J.

Three issues are presented on this appeal:

1. Is the June 21st extension void under the statute of frauds?

2. Is appellant estopped from raising a defense based on the statute of frauds?

3. Is the option so vague and uncertain as to be unenforceable?

Since the case comes to us on demurrer we must assume that all facts pleaded in the amended answer are true.1

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases