1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 90 N.J.
  5. 90 N.J. Super. 386 (1966)
 

PIERRO v. THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF HOBOKEN

90 N.J. Super. 386 (1966)

217 A.2d 880

ALBERT PIERRO, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HOBOKEN, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided March 2, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. E. Norman Wilson argued the cause for appellant.

Mr. Albert J. Shea argued the cause for respondent.

Before Judges GOLDMANN, FOLEY and COLLESTER.

PER CURIAM.

The county district court judgment granting plaintiff's demand for salary due him as member of the municipal board of alcoholic beverage control is reversed.

Hoboken adopted Mayor-Council Plan D of the Faulkner Act (N.J.S.A. 40:69A-61 et seq.) on July 1, 1953, and has since continued to be governed under that form. The Faulkner Act, N.J.S.A. 40:69A-26, provided then, as now,...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases