1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 289 F.Supp.
  5. 289 F.Supp. 187 (1966)
 

BAROFSKY v. GENERAL ELECTRIC CORPORATION

No. 65-596.

289 F.Supp. 187 (1966)

Jack BAROFSKY, Plaintiff, v. GENERAL ELECTRIC CORPORATION, a New York corporation, Defendant.

United States District Court S. D. California, C. D.

August 10, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Smyth, Roston & Pavitt, by William H. Pavitt, Jr., Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiff.

Harris, Kiech, Russell & Kern, by Ford Harris, Jr., and Richard A. Wallen, Los Angeles, Cal., for defendant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND DECISION GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANT

WHELAN, District Judge.

Defendant's motion for summary judgment was heard before this Court on November 17, 1965. Permission was given at that time for defendant to file amended findings of fact and conclusions of law and for both parties to file supplemental memoranda, upon receipt of which the matter was taken under submission. Defendant urges that summary judgment be entered...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases