1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Pa.Super.
  4. 208 Pa.Super.
  5. 208 Pa.Super. 260 (1966)
 

PITTSBURGH v. PA. P.U.C.

208 Pa.Super. 260 (1966)

Pittsburgh, Appellant, v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

September 15, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

W. Russel Hoerner, with him Paul H. Rhoads, J.M. Noel, William Anderson, and Rhoads, Sinon & Reader, for utility company.

Albert D. Brandon, Assistant City Solicitor, with him David Stahl, City Solicitor, for City of Pittsburgh.

Robert E. Jamison, for protestants.

Robert L. Orr, with him Harold F. Reed, Jr., for protestants.

Robert M. Harris, Assistant Counsel, with him Joseph C. Bruno, Chief Counsel, for Public Utility Commission.

Before ERVIN, P.J., WRIGHT, WATKINS, MONTGOMERY, JACOBS, HOFFMAN, and SPAULDING, JJ.

OPINION BY ERVIN, P.J., September 15, 1966:

This rate proceeding began when Columbia Gas of Pennsylvania, Inc. filed tariffs increasing Columbia's gross revenue by some $6.5 million or about 9%. Complaints against the proposed increase were filed by the commission, the City of Pittsburgh, County of Allegheny, Borough of Ambridge, Borough of Canonsburg and eleven industrial consumers. The commission suspended the proposed rates for a period of nine months (July 28...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases