1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 30 Wis.2d
  5. 30 Wis.2d 428 (1966)
 

ESTATE OF MEEHAN

30 Wis.2d 428 (1966)

ESTATE OF MEEHAN: MID-VIEW, INC., Appellant, v. MEEHAN, Executrix, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

April 12, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief by Orr, Isaksen, Werner, Lathrop & Heaney of Madison, and oral argument by Trayton L. Lathrop.

For the respondent there was a brief and oral argument by William E. Sieker of Madison.

WILKIE, J.

Assuming that the encroachment of the two walls and sign on the public right-of-way constitutes an incumbrance warranted against by the deed under which appellant Mid-View, Inc., purchased the property, the first and conclusive issue raised on this appeal is whether appellant has been damaged in any way by the encroachment. The trial court concluded that no damages had been proven. We agree.

A purchaser such as appellant can maintain an action for...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases