1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Md.
  4. 244 Md.
  5. 244 Md. 207 (1966)
 

BAUMAN v. WOODFIELD

[No. 393, September Term, 1965.]

244 Md. 207 (1966)

223 A.2d 364

BAUMAN, ETC., ET AL. v. WOODFIELD, ETC., ET AL.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Decided October 21, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Alger Y. Barbee and R. Edwin Brown for appellants.

Joseph B. Simpson, Jr., with whom were Vivian V. Simpson, H. Algire McFaul, Alfred H. Carter and Simpson & Simpson, on the brief for Joseph P. Dorr, et ux., part of appellees. Joseph S. McCarthy, with whom was James T. Wharton on the brief, for Bradley M. Woodfield and Henry H. Woodfield, etc., other appellees.

The cause was argued before HAMMOND, C.J., and HORNEY, MARBURY, BARNES and McWILLIAMS, JJ.

MARBURY, J., delivered the opinion of the Court.

Leonard C. Bauman, an infant, by Carl M. Bauman his father and next friend, and Carl M. Bauman, individually, brought a tort action against Bradley M. Woodfield and Henry H. Woodfield, individually and trading as B.M. Woodfield & Son, and against Joseph P. Dorr and Ann C. Dorr, landowners. Trial was held before a jury, Judge Ralph G. Shure presiding, in the Circuit Court...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases