While we agree with the view of the minority that it was error to permit the testimony of the lawyer-draftsman of the will as to the testator's intention, since such testimony was unnecessary it may be disregarded as not prejudicial. Moreover, it appears that the court itself disregarded such testimony for no reference is made thereto in its opinion. However, unlike the minority, we find no ambiguity...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
