1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Md.
  4. 242 Md.
  5. 242 Md. 198 (1966)
 

COATES v. J.M. BUCHEIMER CO.

[No. 195, September Term, 1965.]

242 Md. 198 (1966)

218 A.2d 191

COATES v. J.M. BUCHEIMER CO., INC., ET AL.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Decided April 5, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John F. Foley, Jr. and Samuel D. Hill, with whom were Buckmaster, White, Mindel & Clarke and Richard E. Zimmerman on the brief, for appellant.

Herbert L. Rollins, with whom were Glenn C. Michel and Mathias, Mathias & Rollins on the brief, for appellees.

The cause was argued before PRESCOTT, C.J., and HORNEY, MARBURY, OPPENHEIMER and BARNES, JJ.

HORNEY, J., delivered the opinion of the Court.

In this workmen's compensation case, the primary question presented is whether the trial court erred in granting the motion for a directed verdict in favor of the employer on the ground that the injury suffered by the employee did not arise out of and in the course of her employment. The employee (Ruth N. Coates) is the appellant and the employer (J.M. Bucheimer Co., Inc.) is the appellee. As usual, only the facts are...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases