1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. So.2d
  4. 183 So.2d
  5. 183 So.2d 257 (1966)
 

FLORIDA EAST COAST RAILWAY COMPANY v. BLAIR

No. 65-511.

183 So.2d 257 (1966)

FLORIDA EAST COAST RAILWAY COMPANY, a Florida Corporation, Appellant, v. James B. BLAIR, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Rehearing Denied March 9, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bolles, Goodwin & Ryskamp, Miami, for appellant.

Nichols, Gaither, Beckham, Colson & Spence and Robert Orseck, Miami, for appellee.

Before TILLMAN PEARSON, CARROLL and BARKDULL, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

On this appeal from a judgment for the plaintiff in a Federal Employers' Liability Act case (45 U.S.C.A. § 51 et seq.), the principal question presented is whether the trial judge committed prejudicial error when he charged the jury upon the issue of future pain and suffering. We find that the record contains evidence to support a charge upon the issue. See Tampa Transit Lines, Inc. v. Smith, Fla.App. 1963, 155 So.2d 557

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases