1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wn.2d
  4. 68 Wn.2d
  5. 68 Wn.2d 368 (1966)
 

DICKSON v. HAUSMAN

No. 37839.

68 Wn.2d 368 (1966)

413 P.2d 378

GORDON H. DICKSON et al., Appellants, v. WILLIAM A. HAUSMAN et al., Respondents.

The Supreme Court of Washington, Department Two.

April 14, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bogle, Bogle & Gates and Don Paul Badgley, for appellants.

Nickell, Quinn & Tuai and George T. Nickell, for respondents.

LANGENBACH, J.†

Dickson commenced this action to enforce a contract requiring Hausman to purchase Dickson's shares of stock in their business upon the latter's claimed retirement. The court entered judgment for respondent, finding that Dickson did not retire within the terms of the contract. Dickson has appealed. (Their wives are nominal parties.)

Respondent owned and conducted a customs brokerage

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases