1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Or.
  4. 245 Or.
  5. 245 Or. 185 (1966)
 

RICH v. TITE-KNOT PINE MILL

245 Or. 185 (1966)

421 P.2d 370

RICH v. TITE-KNOT PINE MILL

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Reversed and remanded December 14, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William M. Holmes, Bend, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs were DeArmond, Goodrich, Gray, Fancher & Holmes, Bend.

Owen M. Panner, Bend, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Roy Kilpatrick, and McKay, Panner, Johnson & Marceau, Bend.

Before McALLISTER, Chief Justice, and PERRY, SLOAN, O'CONNELL, GOODWIN, DENECKE and HOLMAN, Justices.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

HOLMAN, J.

Plaintiff brought an action against defendant for damages because of personal injuries received while in defendant's sawmill. Plaintiff's complaint contained two alternative theories of recovery. The first was based upon common law negligence and the second was under the Employers' Liability Act. Upon the completion of plaintiff's case in chief the court granted an involuntary non-suit as to plaintiff's second theory. The...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases