1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 91 N.J.
  5. 91 N.J. Super. 333 (1966)
 

LOEB v. LOEB

91 N.J. Super. 333 (1966)

220 A.2d 209

CLARA LOEB, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. WILLIAM A. LOEB, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided June 6, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Benjamin D. Braelow argued the cause for appellant.

Mr. Nathan A. Whitfield argued the cause for respondent.

Before Judges CONFORD, KILKENNY and LEONARD.

PER CURIAM.

We agree with the determinations embodied in the order under appeal with one exception. We are not in accord with the holding in the Chancery Division that a plaintiff who has obtained a judgment nisi of divorce may not at will abrogate that judgment upon her signification of such intent to the court prior to the three-month period specified in the statute. Loeb v. Loeb,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases