RUSSELL v. HARWICK

No. 33867.

182 So.2d 241 (1966)

Lyle RUSSELL, Petitioner, v. Charlotte HARWICK and Earl Harwick, her husband, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Florida.

January 19, 1966.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dixon, DeJarnette, Bradford, Williams, McKay & Kimbrell, A. Lee Bradford and James A. Dixon, Miami, for petitioner.

Morris Abram, Joseph Lefkoff, John B. Orr, Jr., Miami, and Herbert L. Kaplan, Miami Beach, for respondents.


PER CURIAM.

We were asked to take jurisdiction under Article V, Section 4, Florida Constitution, F.S.A., and Rule 4.5, subd. c, F.A.R., 31 F.S.A., to review a decision of the Court of Appeal, Third District, reported as Russell v. Harwick, Fla.App. 1964, 166 So.2d 904. We noted probable jurisdiction on the ground of possible conflict with Baldor v. Rogers1 and other cases and have heard argument on both...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases