STATE v. ATHORN


92 N.J. Super. 326 (1966)

223 A.2d 353

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. JAMES ATHORN, JR., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided October 14, 1966.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Edward G. D'Alessandro argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Friedman & D'Alessandro, attorneys; Mr. Louis M. Minotti, on the brief).

Mr. Joel Sondak, Assistant County Prosecutor, argued the cause for respondent (Mr. Brendan T. Byrne, County Prosecutor, attorney).

Before Judges CONFORD, FOLEY and LEONARD.


The opinion of the court was delivered by LEONARD, J.A.D.

We conclude that the judgment of conviction of misconduct in office and extortion entered against defendant in the trial court should be affirmed.

Defendant first argues that he was prejudiced by the action of the trial court with respect to alleged prior inconsistent statements of the state's witnesses, Constantine Jolas and Henry Dubose, which were used by the defense for the purpose of affecting...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases