STATE, EX REL. BURTON, PROS. ATTY., v. GREATER PORTSMOUTH GROWTH CORP.,

No. 40139.

7 Ohio St. 2d 34 (1966)

THE STATE, EX REL. BURTON, PROS. ATTY., v. GREATER PORTSMOUTH GROWTH CORP.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided June 22, 1966.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Everett Burton, Jr., prosecuting attorney, for relator.

Mr. William B. Saxbe, attorney general, Mr. Larry H. Snyder and Mr. Edward V. Leach, Jr., for respondent.


Per Curiam.

Relator raises several questions in this action. His basic contention is that this amendment is invalid because it was not properly submitted to the voters.

He argues first that Section 13, Article VIII, contains more than one amendment within the meaning of Section 1, Article XVI of the Constitution of Ohio, which requires that amendments be submitted separately.

Section 1, Article XVI, reads in part as follows:

"When more...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases