Per Curiam.
Respondent was admitted to practice in the Second Department in 1948. Four charges of professional misconduct were filed against respondent. The Referee sustained charge 1, in part (false financial statement), and charge 3 (issuing worthless checks). The evidence adduced before the Referee amply supports charges 1 and 3.
It was clearly established that respondent borrowed the sum of $1,044 from a bank and concealed material financial information...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
