1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 92 N.J.
  5. 92 N.J. Super. 319 (1966)
 

RARITAN TP. v. ROTANTE

92 N.J. Super. 319 (1966)

223 A.2d 286

TOWNSHIP OF RARITAN, PLAINTIFF, v. JOSEPH ROTANTE, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division.

Decided October 3, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Alfred T. Hennessy, Jr., attorney for plaintiff.

Mr. Rocco F. Senna, attorney for defendant, Anthony Pedicine.

HORN, J.S.C.

This is a motion to open a final judgment entered in favor of plaintiff Township of Raritan (township) pursuant to the In Rem Tax Foreclosure Act, N.J.S.A. 54:5-104.29 et seq. and to permit redemption. The judgment is claimed to be invalid because of alleged fraud on the part of certain township officials and because of alleged lack of jurisdiction in the court.

The following history is derived directly or inferentially from...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases