1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.Y.2d
  4. 18 N.Y.2d
  5. 18 N.Y.2d 23 (1966)
 

MATTER OF CROWL v. CITY OF NEW YORK

18 N.Y.2d 23 (1966)

In the Matter of the Claim of Maud Crowl, Respondent, v. City of New York, Department of Hospitals, Respondent, and Special Fund for Reopened Cases, Appellant. Workmen's Compensation Board, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Decided June 9, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John M. Cullen for appellant.

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney-General (Daniel Polansky, Ruth Kessler Toch and Henriette Frieder of counsel), for Workmen's Compensation Board, respondent.

Chief Judge DESMOND and Judges FULD, VAN VOORHIS, BURKE, SCILEPPI, BERGAN and KEATING concur in Per Curiam opinion.

Per Curiam.

The order of the Appellate Division vacating the decision of the Workmen's Compensation Board should be reversed and the decision of the board reinstated, without costs. The ultimate effect of this decision, however, is the same as that reached at the Appellate Division. That court in vacating the board's determination affirming the Referee's decision imposing liability on the Special Fund, in effect left...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases