1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 48 N.J.
  5. 48 N.J. Super. 360 (1966)
 

MUNOZ REALTY CORP. v. VERONA

48 N.J. Super. 360 (1966)

MUNOZ REALTY CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. BOROUGH OF VERONA, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided December 21, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Newton H. Porter, Jr. argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Porter & Hobart, of counsel).

Mr. Emil E. Mascia argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Sarcone & Mascia, of counsel).

The opinion of the court was delivered PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the Appellate Division of the Superior Court is affirmed for the reasons expressed by the Appellate Division.

For affirmance — Chief Justice WEINTRAUB and Justices FRANCIS, PROCTOR, HALL, SCHETTINO and HANEMAN — 6.

For reversal...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases