1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Or.
  4. 244 Or.
  5. 244 Or. 159 (1966)
 

THOMPSON v. READ

244 Or. 159 (1966)

416 P.2d 326

THOMPSON v. READ

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Affirmed June 29, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard C. Bemis, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief were Seitz, Whipple & Bemis, E.R. Robnett and Stewart M. Whipple, Portland.

Gerald R. Pullen, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Hershiser, McMenamin, Blyth & Jones, Portland.

Before McALLISTER, Chief Justice, and PERRY, SLOAN, GOODWIN and LUSK, Justices.

AFFIRMED.

GOODWIN, J.

Plaintiff, crossing with a "walk" light in a marked crosswalk, was injured when she came into contact with defendant's automobile. She brought action for damages, and appeals from a judgment for the defendant.

Of the eleven assignments of error, the only one that requires extended discussion concerns the refusal to give an instruction requested by plaintiff.

1. The request was patterned after an instruction found in

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases