HARTMAN v. MEADOWS

[No. 312, September Term, 1965.]

243 Md. 158 (1966)

220 A.2d 555

HARTMAN v. MEADOWS

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Decided June 21, 1966.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

R. Leo Kent and David K. Ebersole, Jr., with whom was William P. Bolton, Jr., on the brief, for the appellant.

Patrick A. O'Doherty, with whom was Hamilton O'Dunne on the brief, for the appellee.

The cause was argued before PRESCOTT, C.J., and HORNEY, MARBURY, OPPENHEIMER and McWILLIAMS, JJ.


PRESCOTT, C.J., delivered the opinion of the Court.

The losing plaintiff in a motor tort case tried before a jury brings this appeal. His counsel, with great verve and vigor, denounce many alleged errors in the trial below, but, when analysed, the record fails to show that some of these alleged errors are presented by the record. In fact, the record discloses little more than a disputed question of fact, which was properly submitted to the jury for its decision.<...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases