CITY OF PERTH AMBOY v. MIDDLESEX COUNTY BD. OF TAX.


91 N.J. Super. 305 (1966)

220 A.2d 119

CITY OF PERTH AMBOY, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, TOWNSHIP OF PISCATAWAY, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, AND TOWNSHIP OF WOODBRIDGE, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. MIDDLESEX COUNTY BOARD OF TAXATION, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided May 31, 1966.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Leo Rosenblum argued the cause for appellants Township of Piscataway and City of Perth Amboy (Mr. Francis M. Seaman, attorney for City of Perth Amboy).

Mr. Stewart M. Hutt argued the cause for appellant Township of Woodbridge.

Mr. Elias Abelson, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent Middlesex County Board of Taxation (Mr. Arthur J. Sills, Attorney General, attorney).

Mr. Stanton L. Levy argued the cause for respondent Township of East Brunswick.

Before Judges GOLDMANN, FOLEY and COLLESTER.


PER CURIAM.

The municipalities of Perth Amboy, Piscataway and Woodbridge appeal from judgments entered by the Division of Tax Appeals affirming the 1965 table of equalized real property ratables adopted by the Middlesex County Board of Taxation.

In promulgating the 1965 equalization table for the purpose of inter-municipal apportionment of the cost of county government, the county board used the "unweighted...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases