1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 90 N.J.
  5. 90 N.J. Super. 306 (1966)
 

STATE v. JACKSON

90 N.J. Super. 306 (1966)

217 A.2d 328

THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. JAMES W. JACKSON, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided February 25, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Charles E. Stein argued the cause for appellant.

Mr. William D. Danberry, Assistant County Prosecutor, argued the cause for respondent (Mr. Edward J. Dolan, Middlesex County Prosecutor, attorney).

Before Judges CONFORD, KILKENNY and LEONARD.

PER CURIAM.

Defendant was found guilty as charged in four indictments, after a jury trial thereon. Two of the four indictments charged him with an assault upon two different persons with an offensive weapon, to wit, a knife, contrary to provisions of N.J.S. 2A:90-3. He contends that the judgments of conviction based upon these two indictments were invalid as a matter of law because there was no evidence adduced at the trial that he used the knife, in each instance...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases