1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 31 Wis.2d
  5. 31 Wis.2d 360 (1966)
 

SMAZAL v. STATE

31 Wis.2d 360 (1966)

SMAZAL, Plaintiff in error, v. STATE, Defendant in error.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

June 7, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the plaintiff in error there was a brief by Walter H. Piehler and Genrich, Terwilliger, Wakeen, Piehler & Conway, all of Wausau, and oral argument by Walter H. Piehler.

For the defendant in error the cause was argued by Betty R. Brown, assistant attorney general, with whom on the brief were Bronson C. La Follette, attorney general, and William A. Platz, assistant attorney general. Daniel L. LaRocque, district attorney of Marathon county, also argued.

HALLOWS, J.

The sole issue on this appeal is whether the state failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt the forgery was committed in Marathon county, where the defendant was tried.

The facts are uncontested. The defendant on October 8, 1964, tendered to Carl Karow, the proprietor of an IGA store in the village of Athens, Marathon county, Wisconsin, a check drawn on the Bank of Athens in the sum of $87 payable to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases