KACZYNSKI v. LINDAHL

Docket No. 1,175.

5 Mich. App. 377 (1966)

146 N.W.2d 675

KACZYNSKI v. LINDAHL.

Michigan Court of Appeals.

Decided December 8, 1966.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Santini, Jacobs & McDonald (Jack T. Jacobs, of counsel), for plaintiffs.

F. Lloyd Symmonds, for defendants.


T.G. KAVANAGH, J.

This was an action to remove a condition which had been inserted by defendants-appellees in a deed to land subsequently acquired by plaintiffs-appellants.

The restriction contained in appellants' deed provides for a reversion to the grantor or his heirs if the grantee, his heirs or assigns, keep for sale or permit liquor to be sold on the premises or use the premises for a dance hall or tavern and thus is a condition subsequent.

Appellants...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases