HOLLAND v. MALPASS

No. 194.

147 S.E.2d 234 (1966)

266 N.C. 750

Euland Randolph HOLLAND v. Liston MALPASS d/b/a Liston Malpass Wholesale Automobile Parts Company.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 23, 1966.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James F. Chesnutt, Chapel Hill, for plaintiff appellant.

Butler & Butler, Clinton, for defendant appellee.


PER CURIAM.

After the plaintiff's evidence is taken as true, all reasonable inferences favorable to him are drawn therefrom and the whole is viewed in the light most favorable to him, it still falls short of being sufficient to show a cause of action in his favor against the defendant. The judgment of nonsuit was, therefore, proper.

Assuming, as we must upon this motion, that the plaintiff was invited by the defendant to go into the portion of the garage where...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases