1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 253 F.Supp.
  5. 253 F.Supp. 122 (1966)
 

BRAND v. TISCH

Civ. A. No. 65 Civ. 367.

253 F.Supp. 122 (1966)

Martha BRAND, Plaintiff, v. Laurence A. TISCH et al., Defendants.

United States District Court S. D. New York.

April 7, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Nathan B. Kogan, New York City, for plaintiff; David M. Palley, New York City, of counsel.

Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison, New York City, for defendants; Edward N. Costikyan, New York City, of counsel.

HERLANDS, District Judge:

Defendants have moved for an order:

"(a) Pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, striking plaintiff's verification of the complaint and dismissing the complaint, for failure to comply with Rule 23(b) of the Federal Rules of [Civil] Procedure; and (b) Pursuant to Rules 11 and 41(b) of the Federal Rules of [Civil] Procedure, striking plaintiff's attorneys [sic] certification of the complaint for failure...

NEVER MISS A DECISION. START YOUR SUBSCRIPTION.

Uncompromising quality. Enduring impact.
Your support ensures a bright future for independent legal reporting.

As you are aware we have offered this as a free subscription over the past years and we have now made it a paid service.Look forward to your continued patronage.

GET STARTED
OR

Read it with your Leagle account.
Sign in to continue


Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases