1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 147 S.E.2d
  5. 147 S.E.2d 223 (1966)
 

CECIL v. HIGH POINT, THOMASVILLE & DENTON RAILROAD

No. 686.

147 S.E.2d 223 (1966)

266 N.C. 728

Raymond CECIL, Administrator of the Estate of Larry Stephen Cecil, v. HIGH POINT, THOMASVILLE AND DENTON RAILROAD.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 23, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Plaintiff excepted and appealed.

Schoch, Schoch & Schoch, High Point, for plaintiff appellant.

Lovelace & Hardin, High Point, for defendant appellee.

BOBBITT, Justice.

Each paragraph of defendant's motion to strike is directed to a specific portion of the complaint; and the court's order, in each of seven paragraphs, strikes a specific portion of the complaint. Plaintiff's purported appeal from the order must be dismissed for failure to comply with our Rule 4(a) (2). Rules of Practice in the Supreme Court, 254 N.C. 785; Williams v. Denning, 260 N.C. 540...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases