1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 150 S.E.2d
  5. 150 S.E.2d 213 (1966)
 

STATE v. HECKSTALL

No. 165.

150 S.E.2d 213 (1966)

268 N.C. 208

STATE v. Felix HECKSTALL.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 28, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

T. W. Bruton, Atty. Gen., George A. Goodwyn, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

Jones, Jones & Jones, Ahoskie Pritchett, Cooke & Burch, by Stephen R. Burch, Windsor, for defendant appellant.

PER CURIAM:

The search warrant was based on a proper affidavit of the officer who stated that he had information from three previously reliable sources that on that day Felix Heckstall had whisky in his house and had sold whisky to numerous persons on Friday and Saturday nights; that affiant has "personally seen crowds accumulating, and numerous vehicles going to and from Felix Heckstall's house on Friday and Saturday nights."

The warrant gave the officers...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases