1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.2d
  4. 246 Cal.App.2d
  5. 246 Cal.App.2d 113 (1966)
 

FAIRFIELD v. SUPERIOR COURT

Docket No. 30901.

246 Cal.App.2d 113 (1966)

54 Cal. Rptr. 721

JOSEPH W. FAIRFIELD, Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, Respondent; SAM MESLER et al., Real Parties in Interest.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division One.

November 3, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joseph W. Fairfield, in pro. per., and Ethelyn F. Black for Petitioner.

No appearance for Respondent.

Pick & Miller and David Pick for Real Parties in Interest.

McCOY, J. pro tem.*

Petitioner seeks a writ of mandate requiring the Superior Court for Los Angeles County to vacate that part of its order of July 22, 1966, which imposes sanctions against him. It appearing to us that the order was corrected nunc pro tunc by an order of the trial court on August 11, 1966, we issued an alternative writ requiring the trial court to vacate or modify its order as corrected insofar as it imposed sanctions...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases