1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Mich.
  4. 5 Mich.
  5. 5 Mich. App. 351 (1966)
 

GILLHESPY v. BOLEMA LUMBER & BUILDING SUPPLIES, INC.

Docket No. 985.

5 Mich. App. 351 (1966)

146 N.W.2d 666

GILLHESPY v. BOLEMA LUMBER & BUILDING SUPPLIES, INC.

Michigan Court of Appeals.

Decided December 8, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Elmer R. Kuck, for plaintiffs.

Poppen, Street & Sorensen (Harold M. Street, of counsel), for defendant corporation.

BURNS, J.

Defendant Laskowicz desired to build his own home. Defendant Bolema, through one of its salesmen, suggested a plan whereby Laskowicz could accomplish this with no cash outlay. Under the plan Bolema would supply the materials and Laskowicz would build the house. Upon its completion a mortgage loan would be obtained on the house and the proceeds used to reimburse Bolema.

Pursuant to the plan Bolema purchased...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases