1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Or.
  4. 244 Or.
  5. 244 Or. 102 (1966)
 

STATE v. VIGIL

244 Or. 102 (1966)

416 P.2d 2

STATE OF OREGON v. ROBERT LEE VIGIL

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Affirmed June 22, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Howard R. Lonergan, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Ronald A. Watson, Portland.

George M. Joseph, Deputy District Attorney, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was George Van Hoomissen, District Attorney, Portland.

Before McALLISTER, Chief Justice, and PERRY, SLOAN, GOODWIN, DENECKE, HOLMAN and HAMMOND, Justices.

AFFIRMED.

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appealed from a conviction of assault and robbery being armed with a dangerous weapon. His only contention of error is that he was deprived of a necessary witness for his defense solely because of his poverty. The witness resided in South Carolina. He argues that out-of-state process for necessary witnesses1 would have been available to one able to tender...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases