1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 91 N.J.
  5. 91 N.J. Super. 252 (1966)
 

TUOHEY v. FALL

91 N.J. Super. 252 (1966)

219 A.2d 883

KEVIN TUOHEY, BY JOAN TUOHEY, HIS GUARDIAN AD LITEM, AND JOAN TUOHEY, INDIVIDUALLY, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. RUTH FALL AND GEORGE COUPLAND, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided May 12, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Harry C. Chashin argued the cause for appellants (Messrs. Marcus and Levy, attorneys).

Mr. Edward C. Hillis argued the cause for respondents (Messrs. Habick, Winkelried & Hillis, attorneys).

Before Judges GAULKIN, LABRECQUE and BROWN.

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiffs appeal from the granting of defendants' motion for involuntary dismissal. Defendants urge that the appeal is out of time and should be dismissed.

We are satisfied that the appeal must be dismissed as not having been filed within the period provided by R.R. 1:3-1(b). Trial of the case began on June 26, 1961. On the following day, at the close of plaintiffs' case, the trial judge granted defendants' motion for dismissal. His oral...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases