1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Misc.2d
  4. 49 Misc.2d
  5. 49 Misc.2d 289 (1966)
 

CELENTANO v. FURCI'S REST.

49 Misc.2d 289 (1966)

Margaret Celentano et al., Plaintiffs, v. Furci's Restaurant Bar & Grill, Defendant.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Kings County.

March 1, 1966

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ernest H. Falk for plaintiffs. Bachkoff, Miller & Steger for defendant.

MURRAY T. FEIDEN, J.

This is an application by plaintiffs to reargue the granting of defendant's motion to dismiss the action for lack of prosecution. Strictly speaking the application should have been to vacate the dismissal and will be treated as such (Kronish v. Seagate Garage, 16 A.D.2d 677). The motion was originally granted because of the absence of an affidavit of

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases