PER CURIAM.
Defendant's claim of prejudicial error is based on an asserted failure to comply with G.S. § 1-180, in that (1) the court failed to explain the law and (2) expressed an opinion as to what the facts were.
Issues 1 and 2 presented pure questions of fact for decision. The court in unequivocal language informed the jury it could not answer either of those issues in the affirmative unless plaintiff had established the facts as alleged by her by...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
