STATE v. RANDOLPH


32 Wis.2d 1 (1966)

STATE, Respondent, v. RANDOLPH, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

August 25, 1966.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Donald Randolph, pro se, for the appellant.

Bronson C. La Follette, attorney general, and William A. Platz, assistant attorney general, and John P. Kaiser, district attorney of Dodge county, for the respondent.


PER CURIAM.

The writ of error coram nobis is a discretionary writ which may be issued by the court which tried the case but only when narrow requirements are met.

"It is well established that in order to constitute a ground for granting of coram nobis an error of fact must be presented that meets the double-barreled requirement of (1) having been unknown at the time of the trial, and (2) having been of such a nature that it would have prevented...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases